Comments on: W3C stops standardization of the declarative format for application and user interfaces (about time!) http://datadriven.com.au/2007/09/13/the-death-of-the-declarative-format-for-application-and-user-interfaces/ Marcos Caceres' ramblings about stuff. Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:44:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au/2007/09/13/the-death-of-the-declarative-format-for-application-and-user-interfaces/#comment-19192 Marcos Caceres Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:47:15 +0000 http://datadriven.com.au/2007/09/13/the-death-of-the-declarative-format-for-application-and-user-interfaces/#comment-19192 Yes, admittedly, I am a HTML-5 sellout:) And yes, to be fair, there were only two "resources" working on the DFAUI. Nevertheless, I still think the approach taken to develop the technology was wrong. Yes, admittedly, I am a HTML-5 sellout:) And yes, to be fair, there were only two “resources” working on the DFAUI. Nevertheless, I still think the approach taken to develop the technology was wrong.

]]> By: ProDFAUI http://datadriven.com.au/2007/09/13/the-death-of-the-declarative-format-for-application-and-user-interfaces/#comment-18789 ProDFAUI Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:25:27 +0000 http://datadriven.com.au/2007/09/13/the-death-of-the-declarative-format-for-application-and-user-interfaces/#comment-18789 Marcos, you know what happened in the WAF WG, and how we experienced the boicot from people ... like you, that sold yourself to the HTML5 stuff and browser vendors. The only reason why the DFAUI progress in W3C were browser vendors, and its lack of resources for building new technology ... don't confuse people. And by the way the work you mention as low quality was never finished or published, so you don't have the right to criticize it and moreover, you were part of the WG that tried to produce something. Marcos, you know what happened in the WAF WG, and how we experienced the boicot from people … like you, that sold yourself to the HTML5 stuff and browser vendors.

The only reason why the DFAUI progress in W3C were browser vendors, and its lack of resources for building new technology … don’t confuse people.

And by the way the work you mention as low quality was never finished or published, so you don’t have the right to criticize it and moreover, you were part of the WG that tried to produce something.

]]>